Re blogging from @nigeljgreen “Canada could determine the fate of a controversial new US tax law FATCA “

I re blogging Nigel Green blog on Canada or FATCA .

http://www.nigel-green.com/2013/03/14/canada-could-determine-the-fate-of-a-controversial-new-us-tax-law-fatca/

Canada’s preeminent constitutional legal expert could provide another ‘nail in the coffin’ for FATCA, a far-reaching and highly contentious new tax law that the US intends to impose on countries worldwide.

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or ‘FATCA’, which Washington is aiming to implement from 1st January 2014, will require every single financial institution in the world to report all their American clients’ financial activities directly to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Should financial institutions fail to comply with FATCA, they will suffer a 30 per cent withholding on every financial transaction of US origin.

The US Treasury claims FATCA is a vehicle to catch tax evaders but, in effect it will do very little to address the real concerns over tax evasion.

Instead, FATCA, in my opinion and in that of experts worldwide, is simply a form of US financial imperialism that will violate the laws of independent nations across the globe.

Recently, Peter Hogg, one of Canada’s highest profile constitutional experts has echoed this view and told the Canadian government that FATCA might violate the country’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and, potentially other existing federal and provincial privacy laws.

In a detailed letter to Canada’s Finance Department, which is handling the negotiations with the US to have Canada sign an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) to force its financial institutions to become FATCA-compliant, Hogg wrote: “The procedures mandate by the model IGA are discriminatory in a way that would not withstand Charter scrutiny.”

These procedures effectively treat individuals differently, and adversely, based on an immutable personal characteristic, specifically citizenship. If Parliament were to enact legislation authorizing and permitting this type of differential and adverse treatment, the legislation would contravene the equality protections in section 15 of the Charter.

There are approximately one million people in Canada who could be brought into America’s tax net under FATCA, meaning Canada is a critical country if the FATCA project is going to be at all effective for the US Treasury.

I am hopeful that the Canadian parliament will, ultimately, agree with the arguments set out in Hogg’s letter and move to reject FATCA.

Should this happen, I would imagine that the White House will look to repeal FATCA – especially as other economically and politically influential countries such as China are also likely to rebuff an IGA on FATCA because it contravenes their own laws.

Nigel Green deVere Group

Blog written 14th March

20130315-154601.jpg

  1. No trackbacks yet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
%d bloggers like this: